It is a well-known fact that the world’s largest and most profitable shipping companies are located in the United States.
Yet it’s a fact that many people, especially in Asia, are unaware of.
The US and its trading partners have been accused of abusing their dominance in the global economy to force a “global economy” onto the back of their own people.
And they have done so at great cost to the world economy and to its people.
The International Maritime Bureau (IMB) reports that China has accounted for 70 percent of all container shipping traffic between China and the United Kingdom since 2009, and the US is the world leader in container ships.
China is the number one container carrier, with more than two-thirds of the world container traffic.
It has an estimated 20,000 ships and has a global fleet of more than 4,000 container ships, according to IMB.
The IMB report also shows that US shipping and logistics companies have a direct relationship with China.
The report cites a recent study by the McKinsey Global Institute that showed that American shipping companies employ more than 300,000 Chinese nationals, mostly in shipping and infrastructure roles, and that the US employs nearly 700,000 foreign nationals in manufacturing, construction and related sectors.
The trade imbalance between the US and China is so big that in the past decade, the US has lost more than $1 trillion, according the IMF.
The United States has been forced to do more to address the trade imbalance.
In 2016, President Donald Trump ordered a trade freeze and pledged to crack down on the illegal trade in goods between the two countries.
But there is another issue that may be making it hard for US shipping companies to compete with China and other nations.
It’s called “shipping container trailers”.
The term “shopping container trailers” comes from a 2009 paper by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a research institution.
It was written by Dr. Andrew Haldane, a professor at Cornell University.
In it, he laid out a scenario in which a number of countries would enter a global supply chain, such as shipping, shipping and shipping logistics.
In that scenario, countries like the US would have a dominant position.
And the US could then compete with any other country, he wrote.
Haldane explained that if there were a “major economic crisis” and the supply chain was disrupted, then a country like the United Arab Emirates would have an advantage because its logistics and shipping companies would have more time to prepare.
This would help the UAE to build up a supply chain that would be able to meet the demand of its people, he said.
It would also mean that the United Nations would have less money for trade negotiations and that, in turn, would affect the price of goods and the demand for them, he added.
The report also states that the impact of a “showing of strength” by a country would lead to an increase in shipping companies’ stock prices.
The result would be that their stock prices would increase and that would push them up in the international market, he explained.
In the case of China, this has happened.
China is the biggest importer of foreign cargo and has increased its trade deficit with the US by more than 25 percent since 2009.
It is also the largest importer, importing roughly 80 percent of the global supply of cargo.
The result is that China’s shipping companies have become the world champions of shipping containers.
The Chinese government has also been encouraging the construction of shipping terminals in the South China Sea, in an effort to push foreign ships out of the area.
This has also led to the construction and opening of shipping ports in other countries, including Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and New Zealand.
The impact of these shipping ports has been felt across the globe.
China has been exporting goods to Europe, the United states and Japan through its ports in the southern port of Qingdao, and to Asia through its port of Ningbo in the north.
The shipping companies that are now making their profits in the Asian and African market have been the shipping companies built up in US ports, Haldan said.
The US has been importing more than 20 percent of China’s goods.
The United States also has the largest trade surplus with China, he continued.
The problems are not limited to the shipping industry.
In 2014, the International Trade Commission reported that China had made it easier for multinational corporations to transfer money between countries, increasing their profits and giving them a leg up on the rest of the international economy.